The Economics of building green

My good friend and business partner Mark Schwinghamer has recently moved to Sarilia Country Estates. I joined him for a glass of wine overlooking the beautiful North Saskatchewan river valley.

As is our custom, the conversation eventually shifted to construction and our plans to build green homes at Sarilia.

Mark commented that he had recently seen an LED light bulb at Walmart. The package claimed that the bulb would replace a 40 watt bulb and used only 3 watts of electricity. Life expectancy of the bulb is 40,000 hours.

When I asked my friend if he bought the bulb, his comment was ‘I can’t afford a $15 LED light bulb’. He bought the incandescent 40 watt light bulb with an estimated life of 1000 hours for $1.

Being an accountant by training, I can’t resist the opportunity to analyze Mark’s decision: Lets assume that Mark uses the light bulb about 4 hours a day.

At 4 hours a day, the LED will last 10,000 days or just over 27 years. During that same time period, Mark would have to change his incandescent light bulb approximately every 9 months or 40 times in the 27 years. So, at today’s prices, the incandescent light bulb would actually cost $40 over the 27 years while the LED will cost $15 once. Total savings of $25 on the cost of the LED vs the incandescent bulbs.

The LED uses 3 watts per hour or 12 watts per day. In 27 years, the LED will burn 120 KWhs of electricity. The incandescent bulb burns 40 watts per hour or 160 watts per day. In 27 years, the incandescent will burn 1600 KWhs of electricity. Mark pays about 11.4 cents per KWh for electricity so at today’s prices, the LED will cost $13.64 for electricity and the incandescent will cost $182.40. Total savings of $168.76.

Advertisement

2 Comments

Filed under Economics of building green

2 Responses to The Economics of building green

  1. Your arguments are well supported, however, there has also been a case for the amount of heat energy being produced by those incandescent bulbs that can’t be provided by LED. Indeed a factor, but is it enough to consider?

    I personally believe that LED does make more sense: generally any kind of change in society forces us to think about other ways to recover/save energy, such as that heat energy lost by no longer using an incandescent bulb.

    • Ronn

      Hey Quentin

      The heat energy case is an interesting one. In the winter months when we need to heat the home, the incandescent bulbs can help. In the summer months, when we don’t want the extra heat, the incandescent bulbs will add to air conditioning costs.

      In a well insulated house like the Net Zero Home I am building at Sarilia Country Estates, we are only heating the home 4-5 months a year.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s